Green synthesis of Cr2O3 nanoparticles using microbes

Main Article Content

Article Sidebar

Published Sep 30, 2021
Alwin David S Ramkumar P

Abstract

Amid metal oxides, chromic oxide nanoparticles are more perceptible due to hardness, antiferromagnetic property, stability, chemical resistance, anticancer propery, antibacterial activity, antileshmanial activity. Bacterial strains like Erwinia amylovora [1], Shewanell oneidensis MR-1 [2], Aspargillus niger [3], Bacillus subtilis [4] and Bacillus cereus [5] were used for the synthesis of Cr2O3 NPs from the chromium salt precursors. Bacterial strains were used as both reducing agent and capping agent. The obtained nanoparticles were characterized by UV–vis, XRD, SEM, TEM, EDS and TGA. UV–vis spectrophotometric analysis of the Cr2O3 NPs confirmed the formation of NPs, which showed the surface plasmon resonance SPR in the range of 250–450 nm. X-ray diffraction revealed crystallite sizes of Cr2O3 NPs which was calculated using Scherrer’s equation. It was reported that the size of the Cr2O3 NPs is in the range of 4 -78 nm. The green synthesized Cr2O3 NPs were in hexagonal, circular and spherical in shape. Antibacterial and cytotoxicity were studied for Cr2O3 NPs which exhibited superior antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity.

How to Cite

S, A. D., & P, R. (2021). Green synthesis of Cr2O3 nanoparticles using microbes. SPAST Abstracts, 1(01). Retrieved from https://spast.org/techrep/article/view/1248
Abstract 111 |

Article Details

Keywords

chromic oxide nanoparticles, bacterial strains, antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity

References
[1] O.M. Kotb, F.M. Abd El-Latif, A.R. Atawia, S.S. Saleh, S.F. El-Gioushy, Asian J. Biotech. Biores. Tech. 22–30 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajb2t/2020/v6i230077.
[2] Y. Wang, P.C. Sevinc, S.M. Belchik, J. Fredrickson, L. Shi, H.P. Lu, Langmuir, 29 (3), 950–956, (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1021/la303779y.
[3] Z. Ahmad, A. Shamim, S. Mahmood, T. Mahmood, F.U. Khan, Eng. App. Sci. Lett. 1 (2), 23–29 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.30538/psrp-easl2018.0008
[4] A. Kanakalakshmi, V. Janaki, K. Shanthi, S. Kamala-Kannan, Nanomed., Biotech. 45 (7),1304–1309 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2016.1228660.
[5] G. Dong, Y. Wang, L. Gong, M. Wang, H. Wang, N. He, Y. Zheng, Q. Li, Biochem. Eng. J. 70, 166–172 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2012.11.002.
Section
GM1: Materials

Most read articles by the same author(s)