The Constitutive Nature of Gender Mainstreaming Discourse: Uzbekistan Context

Main Article Content

Article Sidebar

Published Mar 1, 2024
Guli Ergasheva Ismoil kizi Kodirova Fazilat Shukurovna Dilrabo Bakhronova

Abstract

The emergence of the anthropocentric paradigm and theory responds to the necessity of reevaluating evolving realities, where traditional methods for investigating social phenomena diminish in significance. This signifies a profound shift in science, introducing innovative research approaches. This study aims to view gender terminology and methodology as cognitive structures facilitating effective communication within human rights discourse. Contemporary Gender Studies demand a societal dynamic transformation, notably through Gender Mainstreaming (GM), which predominantly addresses marginalized groups. The study posits that gender language warrants careful examination. Analyzing gender terminology within GM reveals intricate, intriguing, and occasionally contentious aspects. Notably, the USA and UK have transitioned from importing to exporting GM discourse, impacting translation and terminology industries, especially in non-English-speaking nations. This article delves into the context of Gender Mainstreaming in Uzbekistan through the lens of "Own and Alien culture," providing insights into its localization within the country's cultural framework. The study emphasizes the importance of scrutinizing gender terminology within GM discourse, highlighting its evolving dynamics across diverse cultural settings.

How to Cite

Guli Ergasheva Ismoil kizi, Kodirova Fazilat Shukurovna, & Dilrabo Bakhronova. (2024). The Constitutive Nature of Gender Mainstreaming Discourse: Uzbekistan Context. SPAST Reports, 1(2). Retrieved from https://spast.org/ojspath/article/view/4891
Abstract 33 | PDF Version Download Downloads 26

Article Details

Keywords

Gender, Cognitive Studies, Gender Mainstreaming, Discourse, Uzbekistan

References
1. Anokhin P.K. (1968) Biologiya i neirofiziologiya uslovnogo refleksa. – Moskva: Meditsina. – p.55.
2. Arnol’d I.V. (1991) Sovremennye lingvisticheskie teorii vzaimodeistviya i sredy // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. – №3. – p. 119.
3. Bakhronova, D., Abduraimov, S. (2022) The Influence of the National-Cultural Image of the World on the Construction of Metaphors in the Poetic Discourse. ECS Transactions, 2022, 107(1).
4. Fairclough N. (1985) Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis // Journal of Pragmatics. 9. – p. 747.
5. Fuko M. (1977) Slova i veshchi: Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. – Moskva.
6. Fuko M. (2006) Diskurs i istina. – Minsk: Propilei.
7. Humboldt V. fon. (1984) O razlichii stroeniya chelovecheskikh yazykov i ego vliyanii na dukhovnoe razvitie chelovechestva. Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu. – Moskva. – S. 75.
8. Kazakova E.A. (2014) Teoreticheskie podkhody rassmotreniya dual'nosti «Cvoe» i «Chuzhoe» // Vestnik ChelGU. – № 11(340). – S.120-125.
9. Klyuev Yu.V. (2013) Diskurs v massovoi kommunikatsii (mezhdistsiplinarnye kharakteristiki, kontseptsii, podkhody). Vestnik SPbGU. Ser. 9. Vyp. 1. – S. 208.
10. Kodirova F.Sh. (2020) Derivation-Structural Features of Terms OF Graphic Art and Design in English and Uzbek // Jour of Adv Research in Dynamical & Control Systems. – USA. Vol.12/2020. – P. 2747-2752
11. Kogan A.B., Naumov N.P., Rezhabek B.G., Chorayan O.G. (1977) Biologicheskaya kibernetika. – Moskva: Vysshaya shkola. – S. 44.
12. Kolshanskii G.V. Ob"ektivnaya kartina mira v poznanii i yazyke. – Moskva, 1990. – S. 22.
13. Pecheux M. (1969) Analyse automatique du discourse. – Paris: Dunod.
14. Sunderland, J. (2006) Language And Gender: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge. – 359 p.
15. Texts and Practices. (1996) Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. Edited by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard. London: Routledge. – p. 36.
16. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. – New York: Academic Press.
17. Dilrabo Bakhronova and Ozoda Eshkobilova Khalikulovna, “LINGVOSTYLISTIC ANALYSIS OF MEDIA HEADLINES”, conf, pp. 20–22, Nov. 2022.
18. Baxronova D., Radjabova H. Xavfsiz turizmni ta’minlash sohasi terminlarida ko‘p ma’nolilik, sinonimiya va omonimiya hodisasi.// O‘zbekistonda xorijiy tillar. — 2023. — № 5 (52). — B. 7-22. https://doi.org/ 10.36078/1696486163
Section
Reviews & Perspectives