ABOUT THE PRAGMATICS OF DEACTIVE PRONOUNS IN THE KOREAN LANGUAGE
Main Article Content
Article Sidebar
Abstract
The relevance of the research is determined by the fact that by now the level and depth of study of pronouns does not correspond, firstly, to the generally accepted and general modern level of theoretical development of the Korean language as a whole, and, secondly, to the backbone role that pronouns play in the general structuring of the language . The ability to perform the function of a subject, predicate, etc., is one of the important distinctive structural forms in the grammar of the language under study, which requires special study. Until now, as a result of research, only the morphological features of pronouns in the Korean language have been determined, leaving the issues of the syntactic functioning of pronouns unresolved. Such studies are important for the development of theoretical linguistics and methods of teaching the studied language.
How to Cite
Article Details
Korean language, pronoun, demonstrative pronouns, function, types of pronouns, structure, morphology, syntactic function.
2. 이익섭.국어문법론강의. -서울: 서울대.2001.
3. 서정수. 국어문법.-서울: 한양대학교.1996. 157쪽
4. 서정수. 국어문법.-서울: 한양대학교.1996. 158쪽
5. Kim Phil Modern grammar of the Korean language. - Alma-Ata: KazGU.2003.70p.
6. Girutsky A.A. Introduction to linguistics. - Minsk: 2003. 284 p.
7. Kim Phil Modern grammar of the Korean language. - Alma-Ata: KazGU. 2003. 281s.
8. Kim N.D. The question of the main members of the sentence in the Korean language//Philological science of the new century: problems and solutions. Conference materials. -T.: TashGIV. 2003. 62-65s.
9. Kim N.D. Grammatical features of the main members of the sentence in the Korean language//Journal “Oriental Studies”. 2003. No. 1-2. 88-92 p.
10. Kobozeva I.M. Linguistic semantics. -M.: Auditorial.2004.224s.
11. Practical grammar of the Korean language. – Alma-Ata: KOICA. 2000. 248s.
12. 고영근. 구본관. 우리말 문법론. -서울: 집문당. 2009.171쪽.
13. 권재일. 한국어 통사론. -서울: 믿음사.2000. 86-100쪽.
14. 김창섭. 한국어 형태론 연구. -서울: 태학사. 2008. 465쪽.
15. 노대규. 국어의 감탄문의 문법. -서울: 보성문화사.1983.23,167쪽.
16. 박영순.한국어 문장의미론. -서울: 박이정.2001.79-93쪽.
17. 박기덕. 한국어 문법론. -서울: 한국문화사.2003.563쪽.
18. 서정목. 국어의 의문문의 의미기능 연구. -서울: 한국어학회.1987.27쪽.
19. 서정수. 의문문의 의미. -서울: 어학연구.1990.16쪽.