Polysemy of Simple Verbs in The Persian Language
Main Article Content
Article Sidebar
Abstract
Polysemy is a language phenomenon that needs to be studied both theoretically and practically. Its theoretical solution is connected with the logic of language, it is connected with the solution of the laws of communication. Its practical side is the structure of dictionaries such as translation and explanatory dictionaries. Polysemy is studied from the point of view of the semantic structure of the word. The semantic structure of a word is its aspect associated with objective existence. When studying the polysemy of a language, attention will be paid to the historical development of these people, the scale of thinking and point of view. This network of linguistic richness, taken as a whole, is no longer the object of study. Despite its theoretical and practical significance, such a problematic issue still remains unattended in the linguistics of all nations. Iranian linguists have also conducted research on verb ambiguity, especially the meanings of simple verbs. Lexical meanings in the semantic structure of a word are initially divided into two large groups - current lexical meanings and previous lexical meanings. The current lexical meaning is characteristic of the current stage of language development, and previous lexical meanings are characteristic of past stages of language development. Therefore, the current lexical meaning is studied in descriptive semasiology, and the previous lexical meanings are studied in historical (diachronic) semasiology. Among them is the question of polysemy of simple verbs in the Persian language, which is the subject of our topic.
How to Cite
Article Details
polysemy, mobile meaning, conveying meaning, lexical meaning, simple verb, usual and occasional meaning, metonymy, metaphor, synecdoche.
2. A.Quronbekov. Fors tili leksikologiyasi (Lexicology of the Persian language). - T., 2009
3. تکین حمزه لو. افسون سبز. - تهران،١٣٧١ (Takin Hamzalu. Afsun-e sabz. – Tehron, 1371.)
4. هوشنگ مرادی کرمانی. قصه های مجید. – تهران، ١٣٥٨ (Hoshang Morodi Kermani. Qesseho-ye Majid. – Tehron, 1358.)
5. شهلا شريفي. بررسی معنایی افعال مرْکب اندام بنیاد از دیدگه معناشناسی شناختی // مجموعه مقالات ششمین همایش بین المللی «انجمن ترویج زبان و ادبیات فارسی». دانشگاه مازندران – خرداد 1390. ص. 3000 – 2990. (Shahlo Sharifi. Barrasi-ye ma’no-ye af’ol-e morakkab andom-e bonyod az didgoh-e ma’noshenosi-ye shenoxti. Majmu’e-ye maqolot-e sheshomin hemoyesh-e beynolmellali-ye “Anjoman-e tarvij-e zabon va adabiyot-e farsi”. Doneshgoh-e Mozandaron. – 1390. – P. 2990-3000.
6. ابراهیم مرادی. بررسی معنایی فعل مرکب در زبان فارسی // نشریه ادب و زبان دانشکده ادب و علوم انسانی دانشگاه شهید با هنر کرمان. سال 16، شماره 33، بهار و تابستان 1392. (Ebrohim Morodi. Barrasi-ye ma’noi-ye fe’l-e morakkab dar zabon-e farsi // Doneshgoh-e Kermon. – 1392.
7. راحله گندمکار. رویکردی شناختی به مسئله هم معنایی بافتی در سطح افعال زبان فارسی // پژوهش های زبانی، دوره دوم، شماره 2، پاییز و زمستان 1390. ص 125-115 (Rohele Gandomkor. Ruykardi-ye shenoxti be mas’ale-ye hamma’noyi-ye bofti dar sath-e af’ol-e zabon-e farsi. – Tehron, 1390.)
8. علی صفری. معنانشاسی زمینه و تناوب فعل های مرکب در زبان فارسی // جستارهای زبانی، دوره 2، شماره 2، بهار و تابستان 1392. ص 98-81. (A’li Safari. Ma’noshenosi-ye zamine va tanoveb-e fe’lho-ye morakkab dar zabon-e farsi. – Tehron, 1392.)
9. لیلا شریفی. رویکردی شناختی به یک فعل چندمعنایی فارسی // تازه های علوم شناختی، سال 11، شماره 4، 1388، ص 11 – 1. (Leylo Sharifi. Ruykardi-ye shenoxti be yek fe’l-e chandma’noi-ye farsi. – Tehron, 1388.)
10. حمید ربیعی. عناصر معاصر در تغییر معنای فعل // رشد آموزش زبان و ادبیات فارسی. دوره بیست و سوم، شماره 2، زمستان 1388، ص 50-48 (Hamid Rabi’i. A’noser-e moaser dar tagyir-e ma’no-ye fe’l. – Tehron, 1388.)
11. . ارسلان گلفام. فضای معنایی فعل «شدن» در زبان فارسی: نگرش شناختی // پژوهش های زبان و ادبیات تطبیقی. دوره 2، شماره 4، زمستان 1390. (Arslon Golfom. Fazo-ye ma’noi-ye fe’l-e “shodan” dar zabon-e farsi. Tehron, 1390.)
12. Azimdjanova, D. A. (1997). Sinonimiya glagolnoy leksiki persidskogo yazika: Dis.… kan. Fil. Nauk.-Tashkent.
13. Akhmedova, D. (2021). The stylistic function of adjective synonyms in Persian. In культурология, искусствоведение и филология: современные взгляды и научные исследования (pp. 48-51).
14. Rafukjanovna, A. D., Zikrillayevna, A. K., & oʻgʻli, N. N. N. (2020). Reduplication in Persian language. Palarch's journal of archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(7), 5443-5450.
15. Алимова, X. З. (2020). Substantivization of participles in the dari language. Иностранные языки в Узбекистане, (5), 1-10.
16. Nuriddinov, N. (2019). Reduplication of adverbs, past and present participles in Persian language. Theoretical & Applied Science, (12), 634-639.
17. Nodir Mr, N. (2020). Structural-semantic analysis of polynomial verbal copulative phraseologies in the Persian language. The Light of Islam, 2020(1), 170-177.
18. Nodir Mr, N. (2020). Copulative compounds formed by prepositional interfixes in the Persian language. Scientific Bulletin of Namangan State University, 1(10), 71.
19. Akhmedova, D., Alimova, Kh., Azimdjanova, D., Nuriddinov, N., & Xasanova, N. (2022). The stylistic features of nouns and adjectives in Iranian newspaper texts. Культурология, искусствоведение и филология: современные взгляды и научные исследования. № 1 (50). (pp. 95-102).
20. Azimdjanova, D., Alimova, Kh., Akhmedova, D., & Nuriddinov, N. (2022). On some issues of verbal synonymy in the Persian language. Theoretical & Applied Science, 03, (107). (pp. 852-858).