Brexit, international finance and fiscal capacity in the long run

Main Article Content

Article Sidebar

Published Oct 19, 2021
Eugin Prakash Pathrose Priyanka Verma Eugin Prakash Pathrose Mayakannan Selvaraju

Abstract

The elements that influence according to this paper, the approach to international finance and financial governance is evolving, with significant employ for the EU's ability to implement its preferences globally. It appears that two related factors are driving this transition. First, European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) have recently gained popularity in international financial governance due to its unique incentives, priorities, and capacities. Second, as international financial regulation shifts from standard-setting to operational concerns, administrative organizations such as the ESAs have a greater opportunity to exert control.This article examines the consequences of the existence of a social democratic organizational channel by which the EU can engaged with global finance governance using the European Securities and Markets Authority as a research study. The data based on secondary and data collect from the world development indicators. The results analysis run from the smart PLS software and measure the performance of international finance and fiscal capability in long run Results indicate that there is inverse but significant relationship between international finance fiscal capability in long run. The European Securities and Markets Authority has the best track record of any ESA in the world. It also makes some predictions on how the UK's relationship with international finance also its governance and the ESAs as global organizations would be affected by the Brexit decision.

How to Cite

Eugin Prakash Pathrose, Priyanka Verma, Eugin Prakash Pathrose, & Selvaraju, M. (2021). Brexit, international finance and fiscal capacity in the long run. SPAST Abstracts, 1(01). Retrieved from https://spast.org/techrep/article/view/2841
Abstract 75 |

Article Details

Keywords

Brexit (B), International Finance (IF), Fiscal Capability (FC), Long Run Stock (LRS), Financial Performance (FM).

References
[1]. Crafts, Nicholas. 2016. “The Growth Effects of EU Membership for the UK: A Review of the Evidence.” Working Paper no. 280. Coventry: University of Warwick, Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy.
[2]. Dhingra, Swati, GianmarcoOttaviano, Thomas Sampson, and John Van Reenen. 2016b. “Economists for Brexit: A Critique.” Brexit Analysis no. 6. London: London School of Economics, Centre for Economic Performance.
[3]. M. Tamilselvi and G. Ramkumar, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC), 2015, pp. 1-3, doi: 10.1109/ICCIC.2015.7435728.
[4]. P. Parkavi, K. Ramya and M. S. Priya, 2020 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), 2020, pp. 1097-1100, doi: 10.1109/ICACCS48705.2020.9074261
[5]. Dhingra, Swati, Hanwei Huang, GianmarcoOttaviano, João Paulo Pessoa, Thomas Sampson, and John Van Reenen. 2016a. “The Costs and Benefits of Leaving the EU: Trade Effects.” Brexit Analysis no. 2 (technical paper). London: London School of Economics, Centre for Economic Performance.
[6]. Sampson, Thomas. 2016. “Dynamic Selection: An Idea Flows Theory of Entry, Trade, and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 131, no. 1: 315–80.
Section
SMH1: Management

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>