The Utilization of Technical Means in Language Teaching at Universities

Main Article Content

Article Sidebar

Published Apr 7, 2024
Babaeva Lyudmila Leonidovna

Abstract

This academic article investigates the efficacy and implications of employing technical means in language
teaching within university settings. Rapid advancements in technology have revolutionized various aspects
of education, including language instruction. This article critically examines the integration of technical
means, such as computer-assisted language learning (CALL), online platforms, virtual reality, and mobile
applications, in university language classrooms. Through a comprehensive review of existing literature, this
study aims to provide insights into the benefits, challenges, and future prospects of incorporating technical
means into language teaching methodologies. The findings indicate that while technical means offer numerous
advantages, their successful implementation requires careful planning, pedagogical considerations, and
ongoing support for both educators and learners.

How to Cite

Babaeva Lyudmila Leonidovna. (2024). The Utilization of Technical Means in Language Teaching at Universities. SPAST Reports, 1(5). Retrieved from https://spast.org/ojspath/article/view/4987
Abstract 30 | PDF Version Download Downloads 28

Article Details

Keywords

Computer-Assisted Language Learning, pedagogy, Technical means

References
Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language
learning: An introduction. In Fotos, S. (Ed.),
Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-20). Logos
International.
Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language
learning. Modern Language Journal, 93(6), 769-782.
Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for
vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the
platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2),
95-110.
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new
classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online.
Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311-
326.
Thorne, S. L. (2013). Digital literacies for language
learning contexts. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of
research in second language teaching and learning
(Vol. 2, pp. 410-428). Routledge.
Hubbard, P. (2019). The practice of language teaching.
Oxford University Press.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (Eds.). (2018). Mobile
learning: The next generation. Routledge.
Wang, Y., & Vásquez, C. (2012). Blended learning in a
university EFL writing course: Description and
evaluation. CALICO Journal, 29(2), 320-340.
Makhliyo Umarova. (2021). Attitude to the historical
process in abdulla kadiriy’s works. International
Engineering Journal for Research &
Development. VOL. 6 NO. 1.
Umarova Makhliyo Yunusovna. (2021). The Concept of
“A Literary Hero” in English and Uzbek Historical
Novels. Psychology and Education Journal. P. 1419-
1426.
Makhliyo Umarova. (2021). Author and hero’s
parallelism in English and Uzbek literature. Philology
Matters. P. 21-34.
Махлиё Юнусовна Умарова. (2020). The Problem of
Reflecting the Literary Hero And The National Spirit
In Western And Eastern Works. Иностранные языки
в Узбекистане. P. 229-241.
Boltabayev Hamidulla Ubaydullayevich, Umarova
Makhliyo Yunusovna. (2020). Problem of creative
individuality and main hero in bayron and chulpon's
lyrics. ACADEMICIA: An International
Multidisciplinary Research Journal. P. 134-139.
Section
Second PAMIR Preprints