Suffixal Derivation in French and Uzbek Languages
Main Article Content
Article Sidebar
Abstract
The article delves into the application of argotic suffixes and prefixes as derivational mechanisms for
conveying emotional and evaluative sentiments toward the designated object. The authors systematically
pinpoint the argotic suffixes that prove to be particularly effective in conveying estimation. Additionally,
the article sheds light on the unique trajectories through which these suffixes have been integrated into the
current grammatical structures of both French and Uzbek languages. Language, as a powerful medium of
communication, not only conveys information but also serves as a rich tapestry of expressions that reflect
our emotions and evaluations. One intriguing facet of linguistic evolution involves the use of argotic
suffixes and prefixes, which serve as potent derivational tools for articulating our emotional and evaluative
relationships towards the designated object. This article delves into the multifaceted realm of argotic
linguistic elements, exploring how they enhance our ability to express subjective sentiments
How to Cite
Article Details
Suffixal derivation, affixation, argotic elements
word formation in the Uzbek language. CENTER
FOR SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS (buxdu.Uz),
18(18).
Azizov A.A. Comparative grammar of Russian and
Uzbek languages. Tashkent, 1990.
Bujanova L. Ju. Terminologicheskaja derivacija v jazyke
nauki: kognitivnost', semiotichnost', funkcional'nost'
(Terminological Derivation in the Language of
Science: Cognition, Semiotics, Functionality),
Moscow: Flinta, 2016, 390 p.
Chekalina E.M. On the problem of the formation of the
evaluative meaning of the affix // Bulletin of the
Leningrad University. - Ser. 2. – History, linguistics,
literary criticism. – L., 1986. – Issue. 4. – pp. 73-78.
Dehqonov Islom Teshaevich. (2021) L'interculturel en
francais langue etrengere. International scientific and
practical conference. 3 (3) 135-137.
Dubois, J., F. Dubois-Charlier: La dérivation suffixale en
français – Paris, Nathan, 1999
Hozhiev A. Uzbek tili suz jasalishi (Word Production in
the Uzbek Language), Tashkent: Uqituvchi, 2007,
168 p.
Jurayeva Shalola Xusanboyeva, “On the expression of
words from french lanuage to uzbek language”.
American journal of social and humanitarian
research vol 2 no 9,119,120,121
Kononov A.N. "Grammar of the modern Uzbek literary
language" 1960.
Kurt Glaser. «Le sens péjoratif du suffixe -ard en
français», Romanische Forschungen –T. 27, 1910.,
p. 932-983.
Lopatnikova N.N. Colloquially reduced pseudo-wordformation variants of stylistically neutral words in
modern French // Unity of systemic and functional analysis of linguistic units. Vol. III. – Belgorod,
1999. – P. 240-245.
Madvaliev A. Uzbek tilining izohli lugati (1-5 zhildlar)
(Annotated Dictionary of the Uzbek Language),
Volumes 1-5, Tashkent: Davlat ilmii nashrieti, 2020.
Mireille Huchon. Histoire de la langue française, –
Paris: LGF, 2002
Myakshin, K.A. Diversity of approaches to defining the
concept of “term” / K.A. Myakshin // Almanac of
modern science and education. – Tambov, 2009. –
p.109–111.
N. A. Structural linguistics: origins and directions. -
Moscow, 2006.
Reshetova, L. Rod vazhins category sining lexicongrammar hususiyatlari / L. Reshetova, K. Umurov //
Ozbek tili va adabiyoti. 1965. No. 6. pp. 31–35.
Saidov, Zh. R. On the word formation of adjectives in
the modern Uzbek language / Zh. R. Saidov. —
Text: immediate // Young scientist. — 2015. — No.
8 (88). — P. 1160-1163.
Yusupov U.K. Theoretical foundations of comparative
linguistics. – Tashkent: Fan. 2007. – 125 p.