Rapid Embedded Systems Prototyping Redefined: TARS Plug and Play Electronics for Industry, Scientific, and Education
Main Article Content
Article Sidebar
Abstract
This article marks the inception of the TARS Electronic board series, addressing the challenges inherent in Internet of Things (IoT) and embedded systems development. Traditional approaches often consume significant human-hours in addressing issues like breadboard errors, coding, and soldering during prototype realization. TARS plug-and-play electronic modules emerge as a transformative solution, minimizing time and effort while offering an ideal platform for micro and small-scale enterprises, students, and researchers. Featuring the capability to integrate over fifty sensors and various electronic components, including HDMI, Bluetooth, ZigBee, and IEEE 802.11 Wi-Fi, this board transforms into a cluster of IoT systems, streamlining development processes and fostering innovation. Additionally, it serves as an excellent platform for skill development of the electronics engineering workforce, enhancing proficiency and expertise in emerging technologies.
How to Cite
Article Details
IoT, WI-FI, ZigBee, HDMI, Bluetooth, Skill Development
October). The toastboard: Ubiquitous instrumentation and automated checking of breadboarded
circuits. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
(pp. 677-686).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984566
2. Karchemsky, M., Zamfirescu-Pereira, J. D., Wu, K. J., Guimbretière, F., & Hartmann, B. (2019,
May). Heimdall: A remotely controlled inspection workbench for debugging microcontroller projects.
In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300728
3. McGrath, W. B. (2019). Facilitating the Debugging and Understanding of Interactive Electronic
Devices. Stanford University.
4. Booth, T., Stumpf, S., Bird, J., & Jones, S. (2016, May). Crossed wires: Investigating the problems
of end-user developers in a physical computing task. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference
on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3485-3497).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858533
5. DesPortes, K., & DiSalvo, B. (2019, July). Trials and tribulations of novices working with the
Arduino. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education
Research (pp. 219-227). https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339427
6. Brunstein, J. C., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). Effects of failure on subsequent performance: The
importance of self-defining goals. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(2), 395.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.395
7. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
8. Morgan, K., Morgan, M., & Hall, J. (2000). Psychological developments in high technology
teaching and learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 71-79.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00136
9. Cleeton, G. (1996). Perception and reality of learning barriers in an electronics course.
Perceptual and motor skills, 82(1), 339-348. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1996.82.1.339
10. Skromme, B. J., & Robinson, D. (2015, June). Addressing barriers to learning in linear circuit
analysis. In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 26-158).
11. Reisslein, J., Ozogul, G., Johnson, A. M., Bishop, K. L., Harvey, J., & Reisslein, M. (2012). Circuits
kit K–12 outreach: Impact of circuit element representation and student gender. IEEE
Transactions on Education, 56(3), 316-321. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2012.2222410
12. Balid, W., Abdulwahed, M., & Alrouh, I. (2014). Development of an educationally oriented open-
source embedded systems laboratory kit: a hybrid hands-on and virtual experimentation
approach. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 51(4), 340-353.
https://doi.org/10.7227/ijeee.0006