Investigating the Nexus of Intrinsic Motivation, Learner Engagement, and Satisfaction in the Completion of MOOC Courses

Main Article Content

Article Sidebar

Published Mar 31, 2024
Dr. Pooja Nagpal Dr. RameshKumar M

Abstract

This study looks at how learner engagement, intrinsic motivation, and satisfaction interact dynamically within the context of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). It looks at how learner engagement and intrinsic motivation interact and how that affects MOOC completion and satisfaction rates. The review highlights the critical role that intrinsic motivation plays in sparking learners' interest and maintaining their engagement throughout MOOC participation through a thorough study of the body of available research. It explores a number of motivating elements, including personal interests, self-efficacy beliefs, and perceived relevance, clarifying how each influences learners' desire to actively engage in MOOC activities. Furthermore, the review delves into the multifaceted aspects of learner engagement, which include behavioral, cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions. It also highlights the noteworthy impact of these characteristics on the prediction of MOOC completion rates and satisfaction levels. This study provides insightful information about the intricate relationships between intrinsic motivation, learner engagement, and MOOC outcomes by combining empirical data and theoretical frameworks. To guide the creation of more efficient and interesting MOOC experiences for a varied student base, the implications of these discoveries for instructional design, learner support tactics, and future research prospects are explored.

 

How to Cite

Nagpal, D. P., & M, D. R. . . (2024). Investigating the Nexus of Intrinsic Motivation, Learner Engagement, and Satisfaction in the Completion of MOOC Courses. SPAST Reports, 1(2). Retrieved from https://spast.org/ojspath/article/view/4959
Abstract 17 | PDF Version Download Downloads 5

Article Details

Keywords

Keywords: Intrinsic Motivation, Learners Engagement, Satisfaction, MOOC, Online Courses

References
1. Moore, R.L., & Blackmon, S.J. (2022). From the Learner’s perspective: A systematic review of MOOC learner experiences (2008–2021). Computers & Education, 190, 104596.
2. Persada, S. F., Prasetyo, Y. T., Suryananda, X. V., Apriyansyah, B., Ong, A. K. S., Nadlifatin, R., et al. (2022). How the education industries react to synchronous and asynchronous learning in COVID-19: Multigroup analysis insights for future online education. Sustainability, 14, 15288. doi: 10.3390/su142215288
3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9
6. Krause, K. L., Bochner, S., & Duchesne, S. (2006). Educational Psychology for Learning and Teaching. Cengage Learning Australia: Australia.
7. Teguh, F., Wahyudi, H., Musuilah, E., Umayah, U., Syahri, A., & Wulandari, D. (2022). Adaptation and validation of Motivation to Learn Online Questionnaire (MLOQ) and differential item functioning (DIF) Analysis at Islamic University Student. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 633, 347-352.
8. Ngwira, F., Emagnaw, A., Taibe, P., & Adamsege, H. (2018). The role of intrinsic goal orientation on Medical health students’ deep learning approach. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 127, 42-49. DOI: 10.2991/icaaip-17.2018.9
9. Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement (OSE) scale. Online Learning, 19. Retrieved from https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/561/165
10. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
11. Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2013). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context. Computers & Education, 62, 149–158.
12. Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2019). Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs. Computers & Education, 129, 48–60.
Section
Special Series- Informing Institute