Analyzing Sports Arbitration and Its Trans-Border Application
Main Article Content
Article Sidebar
Abstract
The article analyses the introduction to sports arbitration, how it works and sports governance providing for
settlement of disputes mechanism across the borders. It analyses the functioning of different sports agencies
like Court of Arbitration for Sports, International Olympic Committee, World Anti-doping Agency and
International Council of Arbitration for Sports. It provides an overview of the functioning of these agencies
and raises concerns about the transparency and rendering justice to the sportspersons. It also raises concerns
of limited judicial review of the decisions of CAS and also provides for prospective reforms to ensure fairness
in the justice delivery system through arbitration.
How to Cite
Article Details
Sports Arbitration, Court of Arbitration for sports, Dispute Resolution
Rule 59 Olympic Charter
CAS Code R57 International Council of Arbitration for
sports, Guide to Arbitration 5, p 28(1991).
Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. East Cambridge Savings Bank, 35,
(1994) Mass. App. Ct. 734, 743, note 7.
FINA v. Cesar Augusto Cielo Fiho and CBDA CAS
2011/A/2495
W.P(C) 10590/2021 & CM APPL. 32671/2021 (interim
relief)
European Convention on Human Rights,
https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.p
df.
Applications no. 40575/10 and no. 67474/10) (ECHR 324
(2018) (2October 2018).
Black, A. M., Sergio, L. E., & Macpherson, A. K.
(2017). The Epidemiology of Concussions:
Number and Nature of Concussions and Time to
Recovery Among Female and Male Canadian
Varsity Athletes 2008 to 2011. Clinical journal of
sport medicine: official journal of the Canadian
Academy of Sport Medicine, 27(1), 52–56.
International Olympic Committee Olympic charter 11
(entered into force September 9, 2013).
The Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act, 1978
https://www.wada-ama.org/en/anti-doping-partners/courtarbitration-sport