Standardization and Optimization of Psychodiagnostic Questionnaires

Main Article Content

Article Sidebar

Published Feb 2, 2024
Dilbar Mukhamedova Abdimumin Rasulov Indira Rakhimova Muhammadrasul Ibrogimov

Abstract

Psychological diagnosis of a condition/entity is influenced by various groups of standardized and nonstandardized techniques. The leading position among them is currently held by individual surveys. Alongside
these surveys, there is a category of personal questionnaires that serve as psychodiagnostic approaches where
they come in the form of discussions or questions. When employing these approaches, certain criteria are
applied to the processes involving psychology students. The purpose of this paper is to examine the
standardization of survey programs used in psychological studies. During this research, the optimization of
the method for the interpretation of their findings was accomplished by upgrading a variety of specific
questionnaires on an answer sheet. The study was conducted in compliance with respondent comprehension
standards, with the ability to expand them fairly for the purpose of improving the questionnaire answer sheet
processing method and the resulting data, the time spent on processing the responses, the reasonable prices of
the test materials and the nature of the operation. Following the standardization of the research findings
processing system, the validity of the methodology was defined in compliance with the statistical parameters.

How to Cite

Dilbar Mukhamedova, Abdimumin Rasulov, Indira Rakhimova, & Muhammadrasul Ibrogimov. (2024). Standardization and Optimization of Psychodiagnostic Questionnaires . SPAST Reports, 1(1). Retrieved from https://spast.org/ojspath/article/view/4595
Abstract 12 | PDF Version Download Downloads 61

Article Details

Keywords

Unification, Methodology, Personality

References
Balgiu B. A. (2018). The psychometric properties of the Big
Five inventory-10 (BFI-10) including correlations with
subjective and psychological well-being. Global
Journal of Psychology Research: New Trends and
Issues. 8 (Benet-Martinez 1998), 061–069.
Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco
grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait
multi-method analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and
English. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology,75, 729-750.
Ben-Porath, Y.S. (2012). Interpreting the MMPI–2–
RF. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Boyd R, Brown T. (2005) Pilot study of Myers Briggs Type
Indicator personality profiling in emergency
department senior medical staff. Emerg Med
Australas.; 17:200-203.
Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality
inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological
Assessment Resources.
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M. & Lucas, R.
E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective
measures of the Big Five factors of personality.
Psychological Assessment, 18(Benet-Martinez 1998),
92–203.
Hahn, E., Gottschling, J. & Spinath, F. M. (2012). Short
measurements of personality: validity and reliability of
the GSOEP Big Five Inventory (BFI-S). Journal of
Research in Personality, 46(Ben-Porath 2012), P.355–
359.
Hoelzle, J. B., & Meyer, G. J. (2008). The factor structure
of the MMPI–2 Restructured Clinical (RC)
scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, –P.443–
455.
John R. Graham. MMPI-2: Assessing Personality and
Psychopathology. Oxford University Press; 5 edition
(July 15, 2011). 688 p.
Rasulov A.I. (2018). Adaptation of the thirteen factor
version of Сattell’s personality questionnaire//
European Journal of Research and Reflection in
Educational Sciences. Vol. 6. No. 6. Pp.10-15.
Stilwell NA, Wallick MM, ( 2000); Thal SE, Burleson JA.
Myers-Briggs type and medical specialty choice: a new
look at an old question. Teach Learn Med. 12: –P.14–
20.
Batashev А.V., (2000). Multi-factor personal questionnaire
R.Cattell: A practical guide. - Talin, - 88 p.
Baturin N.А. (2010). Methods of quality control of
psychodiagnostic techniques based on the standard of
requirements for psychodiagnostic techniques // Journal
Bulletin of the South Ural State University, series
"Psychology".–– № 27. – P. 7-9.
Baturin, N.А. –( 2009). Test development technology: Part
II / N.А. Baturin, N.N’s // Journal Bulletin of the South
Ural State University, series «Psychology».– № 42
(175). – P. 11-25.
Yegorova, M.S. (2016). Psychometric characteristics of
the Short Portrait Questionnaire of the Big Five (B5-
10)// Psychological research. –– Т. 9. – № 45. – P. 9.
Yeliseyev О.P. Constructive typology and
psychodiagnostics of personality / edited by
V.N.Panferov. - Pskov, (1994). - 280 p.
Mitin О.V. (2011) Development and adaptation of
psychological questionnaires. – М.: Meaning,. - 235 p.
Morov М.D. (2011). Diagnostics of personal qualities in the
system of measurement procedures: author's abstract.
thesis. Candidate of psychological sciences: 19.00.01 /
Morov Mikhail Dmitrievich. – М.,– 27 p.
Rasulov А.I. ( 2019). Psychodiagnostics: methods and
methodology of study of the individual // Monograph.-
Tashkent:”Info Capital Group”, -199 p.
Rusalov, V.М. (2009). Battery Test Questionnaire
«Temperament-Character»// Bulletin of the Samara
Humanitarian Academy. Series: Psychology. –– № 1. –
P. 165-178.
Sobchik L. N. (2007). Standardized multifactorial method
of personality research (MMPI) A practical guide. - М.:
Speech, - 224 p.
Shmelev А. G. (2002)Psychodiagnostics of personality
traits. Sankt-Peterburg.: Speech, , 480 p.
Section
PAMIR One (Preprints)