Effect of Gift Receiving Situations on Brand Attitude Change


  • Nguyen Thi Phi Nga


critical incident technique, relationship realignment, balance, congruity, ambivalence, involvement, brand attitude change


Although, there has been a deep history of research on gift giving and receiving behavior
in the psychological and social literature, however, in the field of marketing, surprisingly there
is a lack of systematic attempt to explore the change of recipient’s attitude toward a brand and
giver-recipient relationship relation as well as the emotions appearing after the gift is received.
In order to fill that gap, this book makes a systematic effort to investigate the probable array of
receiving situations that are likely to make recipients change their attitude towards both brand
and relationships. Toward this end, this book proposes two main variables of gift receiving
situation, include prior brand attitude and prior giver-recipient relationship based on recipients’
perception. Under the foundation of literature review and the coping psychological mechanism
of balance theory, congruity theory and involvement theory, we expect that recipients may change
their attitude toward a brand and giver-recipient relationship systematically after the gift receipt
by solving the incongruity or imbalance between the two entities: (1) recipient’s prior attitude
toward a brand, and (2) recipient’s prior attitude towards a giver-recipient relationship.
To reach this expectation, the specific purpose of the study in this book is if four folds. First,
we explore the effect of incongruity on recipient’s emotions as well as attitude change toward
a brand and giver-recipient relationship after the gift receipt through the different gift-receiving
situations. Second, we examine the effect of recipient’s prior attitude toward a brand on his/her
brand attitude toward that brand after receiving the gift. Third, we examine the effect of recipient’s prior perception of strength of giver-recipient relationship on brand attitude change. And
finally, we try to present some marketing strategies using gift giving/receiving context.
Qualitative and quantitative methodologies are conducted for the initial issue exploration as
well as testing the proposed hypotheses in this current studies. The results of empirical study with
critical incident technique and experiment concluded that our prediction are almost confirmed,
and hereafter are the findings of this current research: For the Vietnamese students’ behavior:
(1) the gift-recipients change attitude toward both a brand and giver-recipient relationship after
the gift when there is incongruity between the two mentioned entities; (2) the recipient’s attitude
change greatest after receiving the neutral brand from a giver who has strong relationship if
comparing to other cases and this is the best situation to influence to the change of recipient’s
brand attitude; (3) receiving the gift from a giver who has strong relationship, the recipient
have greater change in attitude than receiving that gift from a giver who has weak relationship;
(4) the recipients have different emotions after receiving the gift across different gift receiving
situations, especially they feel satisfied when receiving the favorable brand and no particular
emotion or unsatisfied after receiving the unfavorable brand. For the Korean students, the author

just conduct interview and the results is mentioned the final part of this research. In addition
to its theoretical implication, this thesis describes the study’s managerial implications for the
development of brand management in the gift giving/receiving context.


Abelson, Langer et al (1976), “Scriptprocessing in attitude fomation and decision making”, in Cognition and Social Behavior, eds. John S. Caroll and John W.Payne, Hillsdare, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum.

Andersen, Peter A. (1993), “Cognitive Schema in Personal Relationships” in Individuals in Relationships, ed. Steve Duck, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, p.1-2.

Annamma Joy (2001), “Gift giving in Hongkong and the continuum of social ties”. Journal of consumer research, 28, p. 239-256.

Assael Henry (1992), “Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action”, fourth edition, PWS-KENT publishing company.

Banks, S.K. (1979), “gift giving: a review and an interative paradigm”. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. VI, ed.W. Willie, Ann

Belk, R.W. (1973), “Application and analysis of the behavioral differential inventory for assessing situational effects in consumer behavior”. Advances in Consumer Research, eds. Ward S. and K.Wright, Ann Arbor, Michigan: Association for Consumer Research, p.370-380.

________ (1975), “The objective situation as a determinant of consumer behavior” in Mary Jane Schlinger (ed). Advanced in Consumer Research, Vol.2 Chicago: Association of Cosumer Research.

________ (1976), “It’s the thought that counts: a signed digraph anaysis of gift giving”. Journal of Consumer Research, 3 (December), p. 155-162.

________ (1979), “gift giving behavior”, Research in Marketing, 2.p.95-126.

________ R.W. & Coon, G.S. (1991), “can’t buy me love: dating, money, and gift” Advanced in Consumer Reasearch, 18, p. 521-527.

________ (1993), “Can’t buy me love: an alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences”, Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (December), p.393-417.

Benjamin Lipstein (1968), “Anxiety, risk, and uncertainty in advertising effectiveness measurement” in Lee Adler and Irving Crespi, eds., Attitude research on the Rocks (Chicago: American marketing association, 1968) pp 11-27.

Cacioppo & Petty (1979a), “attitudes and cognitive response: an electrophysiological approach”, J.Pers.Soc.Psychol. 37, p.2181-99.

Caplow,T. (1982), “Christmas Gifts and Kin Networks”. American Sociological Review, 47(3), p.383-392.

Caplow,T. (1984). “Rule enforcement without visible means: Christmas Gift Giving in middle town”. American Journal of Sociology, 89(6), p.1306-1323.

Caplow, Theodore (1982), “Christmas gift and kin network”, American Sociological Review, 47 (June), p.383-392.

Celsi, Rechard L.,Randall L.Rose, and Thomas W.Leigh (1993), “an exploration of high risk leisure consumption through skydiving”. Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (June), p.1-23.

Chaiken (1980), “Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion”, J.Pers. Soc. Psychol, 37, p. 1387-97.

Clarke, Keith and Russell W. Belk (1979). “The effects of product involvement and task definition on anticipated consumer effort”. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.6, ed. William Wilke, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, p.313-318.

Cook, T.D., Flay, B.R., (1978). “The persistence of experimentally induced attitude change”. Adv.Exp.oc.Pshychol.11, p.1-57.

Cohn, D. and Schiffman, L., (1996), “Gifting a taxonomy of private realm giver and recipient relationship”, working paper No.2 Buruch College, City University of New York, NY.

Craik, Fergus M. and Robert S. Lockhart (1972), “Levels of processing: a framework for memory research”, Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11 (October), p.671-684.

David A- Aaker, John G. Myer (1982) “Advertising management” second edition, Prentice Hall INC, Englewod Cliffs, NJ.07632.

Duck, Steve W. (1990), “Relationship as unfinished business: out of the frying pan and into the 1990s”. Journal of Scocial and Personal Relationship, 7 (February), p. 5-29.

Eagly, A.H., Himmelfarb, S. 1978, “Attitudes andopinions”, Ann, Rev, Psycho Vol.29, p.517-54.

Fitscher, E. and S.J. Amold (1990), “More than a labor of love: gender roles and Christmas gift shoping”, Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (December), p. 333-345.

Faure, C., & Mick, D.G. (1993), “Self gifts through the lens of attribution theory”, Advanced in consumer research, 20, p.553-556.

Fournier Susan (1998), “Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research”, Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol. 24, p. 343-373.

Firtz Heider (1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Realtions (New York: Willey) Goodwin, Cathy, Kelly L. Smith, and Susan Spiggle (1990), “Gift giving: consumer motivation and the gift purchasing process”, Advanced in Consmer Research, Vol. 17, ed. Marvin Goldberg et al., UT: Association for Consumer Research, p. 690-698.

Fishbein & Ajen (1980), “Acceptance, yielding, and impact: Cognitive processes in persuasion”. See Anderson 1980.

Granovetter Mark S. (1973), “The strength of weak ties”, American Journal of Sociology, 78 (May), p. 1360-1380.

Greenward (1968), “Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change”, Psychological Foundations of Attitudes”., ed. A.G. Greenward, T.C, Brock, T.M.Ostrom, pp. 147-70, New York Academic.

Green E. Paul, Tull S. Donald (1978), “Research for Marketing Decision”, 4th edition, Prentice Hall, Inc, Englewood, New Jersey 07632

Heeler, Roger, June Francis, Chike Okechucku, and Stanley Reid (1979), “Gift vs. Personal Brand Selection”. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 6, ed. Wililliam Wilkie, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, p.325-328.

Henry Assael (1992), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action”, fourth edition, PWK-Kent Publishing Company.

Kelman & Hovland (1953), “Reinstatement” of the communication in delayed measurement of opinion change”. J. Abnorm.soc. Psychol. 48, p326-35.

John H Antil (1984), “Conceptualization and operationalization of involvement” in ed Thomas C. Kinnear, Advanced in Consumer Research 11 (Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research) p.203-09.

Joy, Annamma (2001), “Gift giving in Hongkong and the continuum of social ties”, Journal of Cosumer Research, Vol.28, p.239-255.

Macklin, N.C., & Walkr, M. (1988), “The joy and irritation of gift-giving”. Proceeding of the Academy of Marketing Science. Montreal, Academy of marketing science.

McGrath Ann Mary (1995) “Gender differences in gift exchanges: new directions from projections”. Psychology and Marketing, 12(5), p.371-393.

McGuire (1964), “Inducing resistance to persuasion: some contemporary approaches”. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol.1, p.192-229.

Marry Ann McGrath (1995), “Gender differences in gift exchange: new directions from projections”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 12(5)p. 371-393.

M. Sherif and C.E. Hovland (1964) “Social Judment” (New Haven: Yale University Press.

Osgood E. Charles and Tannenbaum (1995), “The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change”, Psychological Review, Vol.62, No.1, p.43-55.

Otnes Cele, Lowery M. Tina, Kim Young Chan (1993), “Gift selection for easy and difficult recipients: a social roles interpretation”. Journal of consumer research Vol.20.

Otnes Cele Lowery M. Tina, Kim Young Chan (1992), “Ho, Ho, Woe: Christmas Shoping for “difficult” people, Advanced in Consumer Research Vol.19, p. 482-487.

Otnes, Julie A. Ruth, and Constance C. Milbourne (1994), “The pleasure and pain of being close: men’s mixed feelings about participation in Valentine’s day”, Advanced in Consumer Research, 21, ed. Chris Allen and Deborah Roedder-John, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, p.159-164.

Ortony, Andrew, Gerald L. Clore, and Allan Collins (1988), “The cognitive structure of emotions”, Cambridge University Press.

Otnes, Lowery, Shrum (1997), “Toward understanding of consumer ambivalence:, Journal of Consumer Research, 24, p.80-93.

Othman Nor Md. and Lee Pei Pei, “Gift giving behavior among urban Malaysian consumers: a gender comparision”, (http://Phuakl.tripod.com/pssm/conference/MdNorOthman.doc)

Park Seong Yeon (1988, September), “A comparison of Korean and American gift giving behavior”, Psychology & Marketing, 15(6), p.577-593.

Paul E. Green, Donald S.Tull (1978), “Research for marketing decisions”, fourth edition, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersy 07632.

Peter and Olson (1987), “Consumer behavior. Marketing strategy perspectives”. Richard D. Irwin, INC.

Petty E. Richard, Cacioippo T.John, Schumann David (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising effectiveness: the moderating of involvement”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10, September, p. 135-146.

Petty E. Richard, Cacioppo T. John, Goldman Rachel (1981), “Person involvement as a determinant of argument - based persuasion”, Journal of personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 41, No.5, p.847-855.

Pham Van Quyet, Nguyen Quy Thanh (2001), “Social research methodology”, Vietnam National University Publication.

Philip Kotler (2003), “Marketing management”, 11th edition, Prentice Hall.

Pieters GM Rik, Robben S.J. Henry (1998), “Beyond the Hors’s Mouth: exploring acquisition and exchange utility in gift evaluation”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.25, p. 163-169.

Polonsky, Micheael Jay, Donahay, Neal, Rgimbana, Trent King, Bowd, Porter (2000), “Motivations for male gift giving on Valentines day”. ANZMAC 2000 Visionay Marketing for the 21st Century: facing and challenge.

Price, L.L., & Arnould, E.J. “Commercial friendships: service provider-client relationships n context”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63, p.38-56.

Ruth, Otnes Brunel (1999), “gift receipt and the reformulation of interpersonal of interpersonal relationships”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25, p.385-402.

Ruth Brunel, Otnes (2004), “An investigation of the power of emotions in relationship realignment: the gift recipient’s perspective”. Psychology and Marketing, 21, 29-52.

Richins L. Marsha (1997), “Measuring emotions in the consumption experience”. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 24, p. 127-146.

Sherry, John, F. Jr (1983), “Gift giving in anthropological perspective”. Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (September), p.157-168.

Sherry, John F.Jr., Mary Ann McGrath, and Sidney J.Levy (1993), “The dark side of the gift”. Journal of Business Research, 28, p. 225-244.

Schieffelin, Edward (1980), “reciprocity and the construction of reality”, Man, 15(3), 502-517.

Schneider, Walter and Richard M. & Shiffrin (1977), “Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: Detection, Search, and attention:, Psychology Review, 84 (January), p. 1-66.

Solomon (2002), “Consumer behavior: buying, having and being”. Fifth edition. Prentice Hall, Inc,upper saddle River, New Jersey, 07458.

Stagner Ross and C.E. Osgood (1941), “An experiment analysis of a nationalistic frame of reference”, Journal of Social Psychology, S.P.S.S.I Bullentin, 14,p. 389-401.

Suter W. Newton, Lindgren Henry Clay, Hiebert J. Sarah (1989), “Experimentation in Psychology, a guided tour”, Alyn and bacon.

Tesser (1978), “Self generated attitude change”, Adv.Exp.Soc.Asychol, 11, p.289-338 Vinokur & Burnstein (1978a), “Depolarization of attitudes in groups”, J.Pers.Soc.Psychol, 36, p.872-85.

Weimann, Gabriel (1983), “the strength of weak conversational ties in the flow of information and influence”, Social network, 5 (September), p. 245-267.

William Patti, L.Aaker Jennifer (2002), “Can mixed emotions peacefully coexist?”, Journal of Consumer Research, 28, p.636-649.

Wooten, B.David (2000), :qualitative steps toward an expended model of anxiety in gift-giving”. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 27 (June), p;84-95.

Wooten David B. (2000), “qualitative steps toward an expended model of anxiety in gift-giving”, Journal of Consumer Research, 27, p.84-95.

Wolfinbager Mary Finley (1990), “motivations and symbolism in gift-giving behavior”, Advanced in Consumer Research, 17, p.699-706.

Worcester M. Robert and Donham John, “Consumer Market Research handbook”, (Third revised and Anlarged Edition) 1986, McGraw-Hill Book Company.



How to Cite

Nga, N. T. P. . (2021). Effect of Gift Receiving Situations on Brand Attitude Change. SPAST TechRep, 1(1). Retrieved from https://spast.org/techrep/article/view/43